AI services
AI Use Rules for Your Company
Make it clear who can use which tool, with what information and whose approval.
Who is this for?
Companies where employees already use tools but permissions and responsibilities remain unclear.
What happens?
I map tools, accounts, information categories and roles, then turn permissions, checks and exceptions into written rules. Required professional reviews are coordinated.
What you receive
A use inventory, permission/approval table, draft rules, responsibilities and an employee explanation session.
How we proceed
- The entry scope identifies up to five tools, three role groups, data categories and approvers.
- I review account, provider, access and use evidence with the responsible roles, collecting information categories rather than raw confidential files.
- I prepare a table showing which roles may use which information in which tools, with conditional and pending cases separated.
- I prepare draft rules, review responsibilities and an incident route. Required legal/technical review and management approval remain separate steps.
- A 45-minute explanation session checks normal and exception examples and is followed by one consolidated revision.
- I deliver the rules, permissions and responsibility package. Unreviewed rules are not presented as effective; technical security implementation is scoped separately.
Your contribution
Management supplies approval roles, employees identify tools and information categories, and technical/data roles provide account and provider evidence. Information categories are collected instead of raw confidential records.
An example
The example is fictional; it is not a real customer result or return claim.
In a fictional table, public text can be used in an approved example while personal-data use with missing provider safeguards remains on hold, with an owner and confirmation date.
| Example step | Visible content |
|---|---|
| Public information | Use an approved tool with source checks, subject to the company’s authorized approval. |
| Customer/employee information | Do not upload until tool, account, authority and required data-processing conditions are verified. |
| Exception request | Record role, purpose, data, tool, approver and decision; employees do not approve their own exceptions. |
| Takeaway | A company-specific tool–role–data matrix and incident route. An “EU” label or consent checkbox is not proof of legal compliance. |
Timing and price
Entry scope: Up to five tools, three role groups and one consolidated revision. Timing is set in the proposal.
From TRY 55,000 + 20% VAT (TRY 66,000 including VAT).
Your written proposal specifies scope, additional costs, data/access, cancellation and acceptance. Training and consulting start no earlier than two weeks after proposal acceptance, by agreement.
How this differs
This policy work is distinct from an investment map or technical security installation. Required legal or technical review and its cost are explained in advance and coordinated by me.
Common questions
Is this tailored to our company?
Yes. I review how your team uses tools and handles information, then prepare rules and responsibilities for your company. Any required specialist legal or technical review is defined separately and coordinated by me.
Must we buy another service?
No. We choose the work matching your need. Reusable prior information is not billed twice for the same work.
Who coordinates any specialists?
I am your single point of contact and coordinate specialists or implementers, explaining roles and costs in advance. Regulated professional decisions remain with the qualified specialist.
Next step
Let’s clarify your need, desired outcome and the right scope.
Arrange an introductory conversationUnsure which service fits? Compare your needs with a short test in Turkish. No contact details are needed to see the recommendation.