AI services
AI Opportunity Map
Clarify which work to invest in, why and under which conditions.
Who is this for?
Management teams wanting value from AI but unsure where to start; from one process to a wider company assessment.
How I clarify the decision
I meet management, interview the people doing the work, observe processes and review tools and data. Options are compared on evidence, value, implementation conditions and risk.
A fictional work example
The example is fictional; it is not a real customer result or return claim.
A fictional department compares invoice checks, customer responses and document search. Reported time is distinguished from measured time; missing prerequisites prevent an immediate implementation decision.
| Example step | Visible content |
|---|---|
| Work reviewed | Request processing, document search and reply drafting in a fictional team, including steps and bottlenecks. |
| Evidence distinction | Reported weekly time is recorded separately from observation and measurement. |
| Decision record | A candidate, data/access prerequisites, information to verify, an owner and pilot acceptance criteria. |
| Takeaway | A reasoned priority report, pilot definition and 90-day plan. A high score does not override missing data safeguards. |
The basis for your decision
A reasoned decision report, priorities, a pilot definition, a 90-day plan and management presentation. Existing software, automation and process changes are considered alongside AI.
From review to decision
- The proposal defines a single-process, department or company scope, the work to examine and the contributing roles.
- A management goals and awareness meeting starts the assessment; it is not charged as a separate briefing.
- I examine steps and exceptions with staff, volumes/time/errors with the process owner, and tools and data conditions with the technical role.
- I compare AI, existing software, automation and process changes against evidence, with uncertainties and prerequisites shown separately.
- You verify the facts in the draft; the management presentation addresses justified priorities and a conditional pilot/90-day plan.
- I deliver the decision report and outstanding conditions. Usable assessment work is not charged again in later planning or implementation.
People and information involved
Management supplies goals and constraints; employees explain actual work; technical/data roles supply tools and permissions. The entry scope involves management and up to two roles, with half a day of observation. Wider contributions are specified in the proposal.
Timing and price
The single-process entry scope involves 1–2 weeks of work. Department and company scope and timing are defined in your proposal.
Starting priceFrom TRY 45,000 + VAT
DepartmentFrom TRY 75,000 + VATCompany-wideFrom TRY 125,000 + VAT
Your written proposal specifies scope, additional costs, data/access, cancellation and acceptance. Training and consulting start no earlier than two weeks after proposal acceptance, by agreement.
Where this engagement fits
This is neither training nor installation. Use the report with your team or another provider. The management goals meeting is not charged separately as a briefing.
Common questions
Is this tailored to our company?
- Yes. I examine the agreed process, department or company scope and prepare recommendations based on that evidence. This is different from learning to use tools in a course.
What evidence supports your priorities?
- I compare interviews, observation and available records; employee estimates are not presented as measured results.
- Workload, error impact, data readiness, risk, feasibility and ownership inform the comparison.
- Missing information stays open; a high priority score alone does not authorize implementation.
What do we receive on return and total cost?
- I compare expected benefits, costs, dependencies and risks across options.
- The report distinguishes statements, observation, measurement and estimates; unverified savings are not presented as achieved gains.
- I specify how a pilot should be assessed. There is no guaranteed return or achieved benefit claim for an unbuilt system.
What is in the starting single-process scope?
- A management goal meeting, interviews with the manager and up to two distinct employee roles, and half a day of observation.
- Tool and data assessment, a reasoned decision report, pilot definition, 90-day plan and management presentation.
- The work takes 1–2 weeks; the process and potential travel or extra costs are confirmed in the written proposal.
How much time does our team contribute?
- Management explains goals and constraints; people doing the work explain steps, time and exceptions.
- The technical or data owner provides tool, access and permission information.
- The single-process scope includes half a day of observation; interview and preparation time by role is agreed in the proposal.
Does the 90-day plan include implementation?
- It sets out phases, outputs, owners and prerequisites, with pilot tests and acceptance criteria.
- Implementation is a separate scope and fee. Your team or another provider can use the plan.
- If I implement it, usable prior assessment is not billed again for the same work.
What if AI is not the right answer?
- I also compare better use of existing software, automation and process changes.
- The report explains the recommendation and any unmet conditions; a new AI system is not a compulsory outcome.
Can we see a sample report?
- The sample decision record on this page shows the workflow, evidence distinctions and pilot conditions.
- Fictional examples are not presented as real customer projects or measured success.
- Real client documents can only be shared with the necessary rights and confidentiality safeguards.
Next step
Let’s clarify your need, desired outcome and the right scope.
Arrange an introductory conversationUnsure which service fits? Compare your needs with a short test. No contact details are needed to see the recommendation.
Benefits, costs and a sample report
For the assessed workflows I prepare low, base and high benefit-cost scenarios. Released staff capacity is separate from cash savings; setup, operation and transition costs are included. Estimates and measurements are labelled separately; returns are not guaranteed.
Read the six-page fictional sample report
Entirely fictional; not a real client outcome.